This week there on the ever present drugs ads (there were no people in bathtubs this time) was the story that bone density improvement drugs could reduce breast cancer. How outrages is this claim when vitamin D and calcium is significantly more effective in treating bone density issues than any drug on the market. To try to pick up a new market for some drug that should not even be used is just criminal. Billions of dollars in fines is just not sending the drug industry an adequate message.
This is to not even consider that Dr. Cedric Garland has shown that vitamin D could reduce breast cancer by a whopping 75%. “Breast Cancer Going Rogue”
The first thing that should happen is that all commercials for prescription meds should be removed from modern media. Of course I am sure that the US is the only country in the world that has this made readily available because the drug companies are buying their way into government policy by campaign contributions and other ways that we do not even want to think about.
If we cannot get the hands of our policy and lawmakers out of the pockets of the drug and medical insurance companies long enough to stop drug commercials, then it should be law that if a nutritional change gives the same or more significant impact that the drug cannot be advertized. This would mean there would be no bone density drugs on the market. Vitamin D and calcium have been shown to give an improvement in bone density of 3 to 28 percent in one year where bone density drugs are about 2-3 percent per year if you take your calcium and vitamin D with them. This is not to mention the impact on breast cancer of vitamin D.
On another front that I was reminded of in my last post is the comment that all medicine and test that have been done in the last fifty years or more in the US have been done on a vitamin D deficient population. Considering the metabolic effect of vitamin D on the body’s processes, this is a very scary issue. I would suspect that the majority of drugs that we use to treat chronic disease could be eliminated or reduced significantly. How would this affect the medical economy? It is obviously to a very large extent considering former HHS Secretary Levitt’s number-four principle of ‘markets before mandates’. We would not want to do anything that would kill the cash cow even at the deaths of millions of Americans. Last on his list of nine principles was to ‘value life’. Don’t make me take my hand out of that pocket or I will kill you!
And on the swine flew it is bye-bye birdie. According to the CDC Update the percentage of medical visits for influenza like illness has dropped to about 2-1/2 percent or about normal for this time of year down from over 8 percent. This is just like the experience of the southern hemisphere countries that are currently just entering their summer. So are we just trying to sell vaccine? Let’s hope that we continue to mirror these southern hemisphere countries and there is no second spike.
I am pleased to report another survivor story of a lady that started to take 5000 IU of vitamin D3 per day almost two years ago. She told me that all of her aches and pains are gone. She is about 70. This seems to be a regular comment on pain from people that become replete in vitamin D. You just get well. –Pandemic Survivor