Digging deeper into the perception that doctors bring on an emerging treatment that could reduce the size of their practice by 25 to 50 percent is an enigma. After all doctors were given the task to ‘do no harm’. This is where the metal meets the road. What is doing harm? This is a cultural question, a question among friends, a question among enemies, a medical question, and a legal question. In what ever form we chosen to engage this question it for sure leads to a quest.
Does withholding information from a patient constitute harm. It has long been the practice of medicine that harm is done when we introduce a substance to the body that causes disease or we do a procedure that causes harm. It has often thought to be wise to hold critical information about the suspected course of a disease from the patient to prevent them from getting discouraged and bringing increase to the negative impact of the placebo effect. So what happens when we withhold information and more importantly withhold a substance that can have a beneficial outcome for the patient.
I am sure that there have been many cases where the air has been withheld from a person and this has lead to a negative outcome. So how is it that the medical profession has been able to withhold sunshine from people without being convicted of committing harm to entire generations. We go after parents that do not feed their children properly and call it child abuse and yet there for 50 years or more are the warnings to stay out of the sun as it will cause you harm.
Going to the doctor and telling them that you want to have a test done to see how much time you have spent in the sun will most likely bring ridicule as we discussed in the previous post with a doctor treating a doctor. And yet there are doctors that know it is their responsibility to bring you the best treatment possible and have kept up with the science. It may be in your best interest to seek another doctor if your present physician ridicules you. This of course is not just about vitamin D as much as it is about doctor patient relationships and how the doctor perceives your own understanding of your body and your ability to read and understand simple medical suggestions.
There is so much ‘junk science’ out there and a lot of it is pushed as modern medical practice simply for the sake of making money. Our medical system is sick and needs to be sent to the doctor for a check up and most likely a surgical procedure for a ‘corruptectomy’. Our government health organization have been bought off and are run by people with too many associations with the companies that they are trying to keep in check. It just blows my mind to think that we can let companies get so far down the road in misadventure that we are able to fine them over a billion dollars like what just happened to Pfizer. Think of the suffering that most have resulted from the need for such a large fine. I believe that some modern medicine has truly fallen into the current day ‘snake oil for healing’ lies.
So what do we do with doctors that just simply follow the modern guidelines for treating patients without keeping up with a more modern understanding. Nothing! If they are following guidelines which is what you want through your government then there is nothing that you can do. In the meantime another patient dies from lack of ‘air’.
The only way that you can tell if your doctor is giving you the best treatment is his willingness to talk with you without treating you like you are an idiot. To take the time to explain what his thinking is about your disease and what he believes is the best course of treatment for you. However, when new emerging technologies come through what do you do. If the technology is believed to cause no harm then what is the point in your doctor not allowing you to proceed. If your doctor is not willing to discuss benefits and possible harms then find another because as far as your doctor is concerned you are just a means of income for him.
This is the case with vitamin D. Populations that live in sunny countries have 25(OH)D levels that typically range from 54 to 90 ng/ml of this storage form of vitamin D and this does no harm. So what is wrong with you taking enough of this natural substance, D3? In particular if it causes a positive outcome for heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and hundreds of other types of chronic disease.
Doctors were told in medical school that vitamin D was a bad thing because it could cause your serum calcium to spike and this would cause as my doctor suggested ‘your organs to turn to stone’. It seems now that after much reading that the toxicity problem is primarily with D2 and not D3 because D2 is made from yeast and other fungus by radiating it with UVB. The problem comes from over irradiation which causes isomers to from that are called toxisterols. D3 is typically made by using solvent to extract it from lamb’s fat and wool so it is not likely to have toxisterols.
So your doctor is a really good guy that does keep up with the research and understands the importance of vitamin D but has not yet reached the understanding that D3 is much better for you than D2. He writes you a prescription for you to take 50,000 D2 once per week. D2 is presently the only thing that your pharmacist can give you unless he is a compounding pharmacist. At this point it would be wise to ask you doctor if you can take D3 and not D2. Then just go buy the D3 from a company like BioTech Pharmacal in the 50,000 IU capsules.
There is more complexity here than just going into the sun for a while to get our vitamin D although this is most likely the best way to become replete. It would be great if we all lived below 30 degrees latitude. However, with modern testing techniques we can be sure that we are within a serum range of D that could possibly give us health and do us no harm.
But above all else — Go into the Sun! – Pandemic Survivor